Audience Evaluation Summary
Client: HIM Advisor / HIS Insider Weekly
Presentation: Alphabet Soup
Overall Presenter Rating: 9.8 (on a scale from 1-10)
Overall Presentation Rating: 9.8 (on a scale from 1-10)
Written Comments"Excellent--well worth the time and money." "It was great. I liked having someone versed in HIM explain IS information." "This is one of the best presentations where I could take the information and apply it to my work environment. Most valuable to me was the simplification of complex terms and the dynamic presentation." "Great, not intimidating. It was sort of like IS questions you always wanted answered but were afraid to ask." "Great, I learned a ton. The handouts were also appreciated and made the presentation even more effective." "A good mix of hard information mixed with humor." "Great presentation. Exceptional analogies to bring understanding to complex terms and concepts." "Excellent. Most valuable to me were the definitions and peer discussions." "Glen gave clear explanations and definitions. He had an excellent sense of humor and overheads." "Excellent. Use of analogies is excellent for this visual thinker." "It was valuable to me to get the perspective of HIM directors in assessing their strengths and weaknesses." "This presentation was extremely informative, humorous, and helpful. The section on architecture basic training was most very valuable to me." "Definitions and explanations of networks and their pricing and ease of working with them, as far as it related to our IS staff's time and experience, was most valuable to me." "Wonderful use of audience feedback!" "This presentation was easy to follow which made me very comfortable." "Can't think of anything that needs improved! Great job!" "Good presentation. Interesting information. The terminology standards are important in communicating with IS professionals was valuable to me." "Very informative. The discussion on client/server was important to me." "Very informative. Glen offers good samples of concepts explained in simple terms." "Most valuable to me was the architecture basic training--simplified complex IS language." "Glen kept my interest and attention. The terminology was most valuable to me." "Excellent reinforcement of terms and systems. It was very well interpreted with excellent analogies." "To me, everything was most valuable!" "Glen was easy to understand--very straight forward." "Always enjoy Glen." "Energetic and captivating." "Most valuable to me was the terminology overview and linking concepts to form an overview." "Glen provided a presentation approach that can be utilized to ‘IS educate' hospital staff in orientation to clinical systems." "Most valuable was the information regarding concepts. Definitions were a big plus!"
|